In The News
Judge approves $57.5M ANZ class action settlement, funder’s ATE costs
Lawyers for Banksia class action funder face possible court action
CIMIC settles shareholder class action for $45.25M
Boral wins challenge to CEO cross-examination in class actions
Hytera can’t dodge ‘substantial industrial theft’ finding in Motorola case
Barrister who accepted briefs for appearances on same day referred to watchdog
Judge approves $31.5M settlement in junior doctors class action
ASIC claims crypto firm Binance denied protections to derivatives investors
Melbourne law firm argues 700 clients can’t sue for negligence in class action
Aldi infringed copyright of Little Bellies fruit snacks, court finds
Please login to bookmarkClose

A litigation funder whose cut of a $98 million settlement in franchise class actions against 7-Eleven was slashed in half is challenging a judge’s finding that “strong reasons” exist to refuse it a common fund order.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au