In The News
Contest between rival Google ad tech class actions on the cards
HWL Ebsworth had legitimate interest in expelling older partner: appeals court
Law firms team up to file competing Google ad tech class action
‘Parties have gone feral’: Judge bemoans fee spat in barrister’s case against Nine
Law firm failed to bring ‘blindingly clear’ $1M claim for economic loss, court told
Judge suppresses Seven reporter’s settled lawsuit for five years
Despite repeated errors by lawyers, Advanta wins time to pay seed patent fee
Court finds public interest in ACCC’s case continuing against Noni B owner
Initial Isuzu class action trial to focus on whether emissions ‘cheat’ device existed
‘Nonsensical’: Class action slams claim that judge appears biased against corporations
Please login to bookmark Close

The High Court has rejected investment group Mayfair 101’s bid to challenge a $30 million penalty following a judge’s finding that it misled investors about the risk profile of its financial products.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au