Please login to bookmarkClose

A senior barrister who was ordered to provide itemised bills to explain four invoices totalling $800,000 has avoided a contempt of court finding, with a judge saying he was not satisfied the silk failed to comply with the orders and that if the extent of the itemisation were inadequate this was not the result of “disobedience”.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Contact us to enquire about group subscriptions.
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au