In The News
Ex-Super Retail lawyer wants lid lifted on settlement for public defence
Phoslock class action doesn’t have to bear costs from competing case
Bayer can’t get High Court to hear Xarelto patent fight
Fonterra says Bega on ‘recreational fishing’ trip with doc bid in spat over Aussie exit
Foxtel breached gambling ad rules during AFL game, ACMA finds
Constitutional law silk joins Federal Court bench
Piper Alderman lures six partners from Squire Patton Boggs
Judge grills ex-Star boss over ‘startling’ report on Suncity junket
‘Too dangerous’: Judge wants express waiver to hear AUSTRAC’s case against Star
Solicitor referred to watchdog for ‘dumping’ client on eve of hearing in Qantas case
Please login to bookmark Close

A class action has been filed against a NSW luxury developer and a local council by property owners alleging the land selected for a 683-lot project was unfit for residential development.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au