In The News
Court rejects NAB super trustee’s bid for first-ever class action indemnity costs
Doctor’s defamation case over online reviews fails to clear serious harm bar
Law firm might drop iPhone class action against Apple, court told
Quintis misled the market, but class action’s loss narrative lost the case
Judge rejects Cannon-Brookes exec’s claim he was doing his job
Glencore sues Port of Newcastle over wharf charges
BHP says ‘extremely significant’ changes to class action put trial date at risk
Spotless, Ventia execs to keep quiet in ACCC cartel case
In defamation defence, News Corp says Hells Angels member has bad reputation
Ten reaches deal with Lisa Wilkinson over Lehrmann defence costs
Please login to bookmark Close

A Melbourne doctor has lost his defamation suit over negative online reviews, with a judge saying she was not convinced the “spleen venting reviews” damaged his business or caused serious harm to his reputation.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au