In The News
Contingency fees are relevant to class action transfer bids, High Court rules
Solicitor for ASIC may face grilling over privilege claim in ASX CHESS case
Judge concerned lawyers for ex-Bulldogs player ‘misled’ court
ASIC sues AustralianSuper over alleged death benefit claim delays
Court merges IAL class actions that piggybacked on ASIC case
Warner Bros can’t kill Casella Wines’ Beetlejuice trade mark
High Court to rule on significance, and reach, of Victoria’s contingency fees
Law firms ask court to bless $42.5M cut of $170M Allianz class action settlement
Ex-Super Retail lawyer can’t appeal suppression order for public defence
J&J slams class action over cold and flu medications
Please login to bookmark Close

The Supreme Court of Victoria has been urged not to meddle with a 25 per cent group costs order in a junk insurance class action that settled for $170 million, in what would be the court’s second blessing of a law firm contingency fee.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au