In The News
Contingency fees are relevant to class action transfer bids, High Court rules
Ex-Star CEO thought GC was being ‘dramatic’ when raising Suncity concerns
Solicitor for ASIC may face grilling over privilege claim in ASX CHESS case
Judge concerned lawyers for ex-Bulldogs player ‘misled’ court
Warner Bros can’t kill Casella Wines’ Beetlejuice trade mark
ASIC sues AustralianSuper over alleged death benefit claim delays
Court merges IAL class actions that piggybacked on ASIC case
High Court to rule on significance, and reach, of Victoria’s contingency fees
Law firms ask court to bless $42.5M cut of $170M Allianz class action settlement
Ex-Super Retail lawyer can’t appeal suppression order for public defence
Please login to bookmark Close

The judge overseeing an NRL player’s case alleging he was forced to wrestle 30 teammates as punishment has expressed concerns the court was “misled” by his lawyers about efforts to procure evidence from other players.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au