Please login to bookmarkClose

The plaintiffs in an investor class action filed against Dick Smith’s insurers want a separate hearing from four other representative and company proceedings against the failed electronics retailer, arguing there would be only the “thinnest basis” for concurrent proceedings if their strike out application was successful.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Contact us to enquire about group subscriptions.
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au