In The News
Judge in failed CBA class actions used ‘far too onerous’ materiality test, appeals court told
Class action over ‘cookie cutter’ legal advice says declassing application should wait
Court OKs stolen wages settlement, holds off on ‘eye-watering’ fees
ASIC takes NAB to court over customer hardship claims
Seven settles lawsuit by ex-Spotlight reporter
Settlement reached with ‘highly unethical’ mastermind of Banksia class action
Full Court cites ‘wider relevance’ of copy and paste judgment
DWF snags 9 partners from Hall & Wilcox
Tasmanian judge found to have assaulted fiance spared jail time
Barristers acting on instructions from solicitor to be exempt from AML/CTF regime
Please login to bookmarkClose

The federal Attorney General’s Department has faced calls to reveal the constitutional heads of power behind the latest class action reform bill that aims to cap the amount of fees and commission lawyers and funders can earn.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au