In The News
‘Considerable disquiet’: Pelvic mesh group members can challenge $405M settlements
Judge rejects sacked Super Retail Group execs’ settlement claims
$56M settlement approved in Monash IVF class action
Kids clothing retailer hit with $5M penalty for worker exploitation
Third person sentenced over $180M Courtenay House Ponzi scheme
Lawyerly holiday publishing schedule
Johnson & Johnson hit with class action over cold and flu medications
ASIC, Noumi win appeal in privilege fight over PwC report
‘In all circumstances unconscionable’: ASIC wins case against forex broker
Limitations defences not relevant to new claims in Victoria class actions, court told
Please login to bookmarkClose

The High Court has rejected an application by a Sydney barrister to hear his case over $320,000 in disputed fees, saying the appeal was not a suitable case for ventilating issues over the operation of terms in costs agreements rendered void.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au