In The News
Armour takeover case against Baker McKenzie can’t boost damages to $135M
Banksia silk wants to cross-examine prosecutor’s witnesses in criminal case
India wins foreign state immunity appeal in fight over $111.3M arbitral award
$3M class action settlement over Nine’s Palm Island coverage wins approval
EDO rejects financial concerns after paying Santos legal costs
Contest between rival Google ad tech class actions on the cards
Large swath of Australia’s chief legal officers don’t report to the big boss
Pawn shop class action lead applicant MIA, court hears
HWL Ebsworth had legitimate interest in expelling older partner: appeals court
Law firms team up to file competing Google ad tech class action
Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has rejected a new pleading that would have upped the damages to $135 million in a case by a shareholder of failed energy company Armour Group alleging law firm Baker McKenzie was knowingly involved in a plan to take control of the company for cheap.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au