Most Recent
Sleeping Duck shareholder rejected $4M settlement in failed oppression suit
Securities 2024-09-04 11:32 pm By Andy Sidler

A Sleeping Duck shareholder has been ordered to pay the company’s costs on an indemnity basis in its failed oppression suit, with a judge finding that its decisions to reject Sleeping Duck’s buy-out offers of roughly $4 million were unreasonable.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Mattress company Sleeping Duck prevails in shareholder’s oppression lawsuit
Retail 2024-06-17 3:22 pm By Christine Caulfield

Sleeping Duck has defeated a minority shareholder’s case accusing it of engaging in oppression, with a judge rejecting claims the mattress company’s two founders diluted the shareholder’s interest and rejected commercially unreasonable offers to sell.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

‘Silly case’ between class action applicant, funder settles
Class Actions 2023-05-16 4:24 pm By Christine Caulfield

A clash between a class action applicant and a litigation funder over $1.2 million in claimed expenses has settled, after a judge ordered the sides to personally attend mediation.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ā€˜Court is not a place for their sportā€™: Judge slams stoush between funder, class action applicant
Class Actions 2023-03-03 9:59 pm By Cindy Cameronne

A judge has ordered a litigation funder and the lead applicant in a settled class action to personally mediate a stoush over expenses, saying he doubted the applicant’s $1.2 million claim and said the court is “not a place for their sportā€.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Court accepts Ramsay Health in-house counsel ‘drowning in work’ during COVID-19
Legal Ethics 2022-05-11 9:00 pm By Sam Matthews

Ramsay Health Care Australia has been let off the hook for using emails subpoenaed in a defamation case between two feuding surgeons at one of its hospitals, with a judge accepting that an in-house lawyer was “mortified” by her mistake and was “drowning in work” at the time.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Arasor class action applicant can’t dodge funder’s legal bill after ‘shambolic’ handling of side dispute
Class Actions 2021-08-16 12:34 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The lead applicant in a settled shareholder class action against technology company Arasor can’t dodge funder International Litigation Partners’ costs, which it was ordered to pay after a judge rejected its “shambolic” attempts to be heard over a $1.2 million personal expenses dispute with the funder.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Ex-Murray Goulburn execs say judge should not disqualify them again
Securities 2019-11-13 11:27 pm By Miklos Bolza

The former chief financial officer of Murray Goulburn has asked a judge to relieve him from any disqualification order sought by the corporate watchdog in its case over his alleged role in the milk supplier’s continuous disclosure breaches, saying he is already the subject of orders that ban him from the dairy industry.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

After ASIC raises ire, judge sets down new rules for regulators in his court
ASIC 2019-10-04 10:46 pm By Christine Caulfield

ASIC and other government regulators bringing enforcement action in the docket of one Federal Court judge must abide by a strict new protocol to prevent a repeat of the corporate watchdog’s “wait and see” strategy in a case against ex-Murray Goulburn directors that came close, the judge said, to bringing the administration of justice into disrepute.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ASIC’s belated case against ex-Murray Goulburn execs survives, but judge says never again
ASIC 2019-10-04 10:05 pm By Christine Caulfield

A judge has refused a bid by two former Murray Goulburn executives to throw out a disqualification case brought by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, despite admonishing the corporate regulator for its delay in bringing the case and establishing a protocol for regulators filing cases in his docket.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?