Most Recent
iProsperity liquidators can prioritise $62.5M claims against Crown, Star: Full Court
Restructuring & Insolvency 2024-08-19 11:59 pm By Cindy Cameronne

The former general manager of iProsperity has lost his challenge to the collapsed fund manager’s liquidators getting more time to investigate $18 million in payments he received, with the Full Court finding they were not wrong to prioritise investigations into $62.5 million in payments to Crown and The Star.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court asked to weigh in on scope of whistleblower protections
Appeals 2024-08-16 11:33 pm By Sam Matthews

A former debt collector who accused the ATO of using heavy handed debt collection tactics against taxpayers has asked the High Court to overrule a decision that found he was not immune from prosecution. In a decision handed down in June, the South Australia Court of Appeal dismissed Richard Boyle’s second bid for immunity from…

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Judges don’t have to give ‘running commentary’ on oral submissions, court says
Courts 2024-08-15 11:02 pm By Sam Matthews

An appeals court has rejected oOh!media’s claim that it was denied procedural fairness in a dispute with Transport for NSW, saying judges are not required to give a “running commentary” on oral submissions and that counsel must be “constantly alert” when appearing in court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

GM can’t ‘walk away’ from language of settlement with class action plaintiff: appeals court
Class Actions 2024-08-15 11:03 pm By Sam Matthews

General Motors has failed to overturn a decision that put it on the hook for the applicant’s full costs in a partial settlement in a class action on behalf of Holden dealers, with an appeals court finding GM could not “walk away” from the ordinary meaning of the phrase ‘the plaintiff’s costs of the proceedings’.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Fanatics wins timeout amid appeal of loss to AFL merchandise maker
Appeals 2024-08-15 11:55 pm By Cindy Cameronne

A judge has granted a limited stay of an injunction against US sports merchandise Fanatics after AFL merchandise maker FanFirm won its case alleging the US company knew about its ‘Fanatics’ trade marks.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Judges not constrained by unconscionable conduct checklist, High Court finds
Competition & Consumer Protection 2024-08-14 11:56 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The High Court has rejected an appeal by Captain Cook College of a finding that it engaged in systemic unconscionable conduct by enrolling thousands of unsuitable students, finding courts are not constrained by factors the consumer law says it “may consider” in deciding if conduct rises to the level of unconscionability.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

High Court upholds court’s power to set aside arbitration ruling in $130M spat with Chevron
High Court 2024-08-14 10:42 pm By Sam Matthews

The High Court has rejected an appeal from a joint venture that provided work on Chevron’s Gorgon liquified natural gas project that argued the Western Australia appeals court lacked power to uphold a ruling that set aside an arbitration ruling in a $130 million dispute over the project.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Split High Court says proportionate liability claims apply in arbitration
Construction 2024-08-09 11:31 pm By Christine Caulfield

The High Court has issued a ruling that significantly alters the playing field in domestic commercial arbitration, finding that proportionate liability defences can apply despite limitations on claimants joining third parties to disputes.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

ATO asks High Court to reverse PepsiCo’s win on royalty withholding tax
Intellectual Property 2024-08-09 11:41 pm By Sam Matthews

The tax office has asked the High Court to overturn a decision which found that payments made by Asahi Breweries-owned Schweppes to PepsiCo under agreements to sell brands such as Pepsi and Mountain Dew in Australia were not subject to a royalty withholding tax. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Class closure split to be resolved by High Court
Class Actions 2024-08-08 11:38 pm By Christine Caulfield

The High Court has agreed to step in to resolve division among Australia’s courts on the question of power to make orders that exclude unregistered group members from class action settlements.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?