Most Recent
Sharetea wins trial delay in trade mark case by global bubble tea giant
Intellectual Property 2024-06-14 11:50 pm By Sam Matthews

A judge has granted Australian bubble tea franchise Sharetea a third adjournment of a trial in a $10 million case brought by its Taiwanese franchisor, despite “very significant concern” that Sharetea’s director did not do everything in his power to find new lawyers in time.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Ex-CEO won’t claim ‘primary responsibility’ for Zambrero’s success
Competition & Consumer Protection 2024-06-14 11:04 pm By Sam Matthews

Mexican fast food giant Zambrero has settled misleading and deceptive conduct claims brought against ex-CEO Stuart Cook, who has agreed to refrain from representing that he is “primarily responsible” for the chain’s success. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Monster Energy settles trade mark fight with PepsiCo over popular snack food
Intellectual Property 2024-06-07 12:21 pm By Christine Caulfield

A three-year court battle over PepsiCo’s Monster Munch trade mark has been resolved, with Monster Energy negotiating the removal of some beverage products that would have been covered by the mark.C

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Domino’s faces threat of shareholder class action
Class Actions 2024-06-03 11:02 pm By Sam Matthews

Domino’s is facing a potential shareholder class action for allegedly misleading the market about its expected performance in Japan. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Noumi, ASIC fight ruling that privilege over PwC report waived during probe
Appeals 2024-05-28 11:27 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Noumi and ASIC are challenging a finding that the food manufacturer waived legal professional privilege over a PricewaterhouseCoopers report commissioned by its lawyers at Ashurst by disclosing the report during an ASIC investigation.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

McDonald’s resists giving sales data to Hungry Jack’s board, CEO in row over misleading ads
Intellectual Property 2024-05-23 11:48 pm By Christine Caulfield

In a continuing fight over damages stemming from misleading burger ads, McDonald’s has opposed production of sales information to Hungry Jack’s directors and its top executive, saying the information was confidential and the companies “fierce competitors”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Funder ‘pulled the pin’ on franchisee class action against Fogo Brazilia, court told
Class Actions 2024-05-20 11:24 pm By Cindy Cameronne

A funder that was bankrolling a class action against restaurant chain Fogo Brazilia alleging it misled franchisees about the profitability of its businesses has “pulled the pin” on the case, with the law firm running the proceeding agreeing to act on a no win, no fee basis. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Pizza Hut cops $2.5 million penalty for spam breaches
Privacy & Cybersecurity 2024-05-16 11:02 pm By Andy Sidler

Pizza Hut has paid $2.5 million in penalties for breaching spam laws when it sent more than 10 million unsolicited marketing messages to customers. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

7-Eleven defeats Seven Network’s opposition to ‘7-Select’ trade mark
Intellectual Property 2024-05-03 11:51 pm By Andy Sidler

Convenience chain 7-Eleven has defeated Seven Network’s challenge to its bid to trade mark ‘7-Select’ for a new brand of products targeting younger shoppers, with an IP Australia delegate finding consumer confusion was not likely.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Retail Food Group to pay nothing to settle Michel’s Patisserie class action
Class Actions 2024-05-02 5:00 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The law firm and funder that ran a class action against Retail Food Group on behalf of current and former franchisees of its Michel’s Patisserie chain will be out of pocket, after the company agreed to a settlement under which it will pay nothing.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?