Most Recent
Seeing red: Priceline can’t trade mark signature pink
Intellectual Property 2022-05-06 11:03 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Discount pharmacy Priceline cannot trade mark the signature bright pink that adorns it shopfront signs and awnings, an IP Australia delegate has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Amazon computer patent ‘nothing more than a scheme’, IP Australia says
Intellectual Property 2021-02-18 5:10 pm By Miklos Bolza

IP Australia has rejected e-commerce giant Amazon’s patent application for a method of allocating resources in virtual computers, finding the patent’s claims were “nothing more than a scheme for scheduling work” and were not a manner of manufacture.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Advanta patent lapses after renewal correspondence sent to departed employees
Intellectual Property 2020-11-25 4:29 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Advanta Seeds has been denied more time to pay renewal fees for its patent for a hybrid plant cell after correspondence from its lawyers about the renewal was sent to employees that had left the company and the patent renewal fell through the cracks during a 2016 systems upgrade.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Bega melts Saputo bid to trade mark cheese cartoon figure
Intellectual Property 2020-06-11 10:57 am By Cat Fredenburgh

Cheese maker Saputo’s proposed trade mark for an adorable cheese cartoon figure is substantially identical to Bega’s intellectual property for a ‘smiling anthropomorphised’ cheese biped and cannot be trade marked, a delegate of the trade marks office has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Melbourne dermatologist wins ugly fight with Johnson & Johnson over beauty cream trade mark
Intellectual Property 2020-01-22 11:31 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The owner of a Melbourne-based dermatology clinic has come out on top in a battle with Johnson & Johnson over a trade mark for creams and cosmetic products.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

From angry clients to angrier ex-partners: law firms felt the sting of litigation in 2019
Business of Law 2020-01-10 11:49 pm By Christine Caulfield

Running a law firm is not without risk, chief among them staring down a lawsuit by a client, an ex-partner or employee, even a rival firm. Last year, Australian firms faced numerous actions alleging everything from sex discrimination to negligence.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Gilead says Glaxo venture’s HIV patent invalid
Intellectual Property 2019-12-10 11:57 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

US biotech giant Gilead has struck back at a patent infringement lawsuit brought by a specialist HIV pharmaceutical company majority owned by GlaxoSmithKline, saying the patent at the centre of the lawsuit is invalid.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

IP firm pursues potential lawsuit against HWL Ebsworth
Business of Law 2019-11-13 10:34 pm By Miklos Bolza

A specialist IP law firm has launched preliminary discovery proceedings against HWL Ebsworth after one of its lawyers jumped ship.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Spruson & Ferguson nabs of counsel from Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
Intellectual Property 2019-08-13 2:23 pm By Christine Caulfield

IP boutique Spruson & Ferguson has lured former Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick patent attorney Ken Bolton to join the firm’s Sydney office as of counsel.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Coca Cola unit wins removal of Sunraysia’s ‘Honest Kids’ trade mark
Intellectual Property 2019-06-05 3:55 pm By Miklos Bolza

A subsidiary of Coca Cola has won its bid for removal of Sunraysia Natural Beverages’ Honest Kids trade mark for non-use, with IP Australia finding only “minimal and isolated” uses of the disputed mark.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?