Most Recent
Auto parts copycat Frontline fined $1.1M for infringement
Intellectual Property 2019-01-21 8:10 pm By Miklos Bolza

A judge has ordered auto components distributor Frontline Australasia to pay $1.1 million in damages after reproducing wire harnesses made by Lumen Australia without permission and supplying the unauthorised parts to car makers Mazda and Mitsubishi.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Hugo Boss, Tommy Hilfiger, Lacoste sue Sydney boutique over knockoffs
Intellectual Property 2019-01-21 3:16 pm By Miklos Bolza

Three global fashion giants are suing a Sydney-based boutique for allegedly importing and selling knockoff versions of their clothing.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Writers’ Guild settles dispute over screenwriter royalties
Intellectual Property 2019-01-18 10:11 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The Australian Writers’ Guild has resolved its long-running dispute with the Audio-Visual Copyright Society alleging the royalties distributor misdirected millions in royalties owed to Australian screenwriters.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Full Court puts injector pen patent appeal on fast track
Intellectual Property 2019-01-17 2:03 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

The Full Federal Court has expedited an appeal filed Christmas Eve byĀ Sanofi-Aventis of a ruling that denied itsĀ bid to block Alphapharm from listing an insulin injector pen on the Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

IP Australia challenges landmark Rokt software patent ruling
Intellectual Property 2019-01-17 9:50 am By Cat Fredenburgh

IP Australia has brought a challenge to a landmark court victory for startup Rokt approving a computer software patent.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Carlisle, Resimax settle copyright dispute over home designs
Intellectual Property 2019-01-16 1:44 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Home builder Carlisle Homes has agreed to settle its lawsuit against home builder Resimax after its rival agreed to stop selling residential home plans that allegedly infringe Carlisle’s copyright-protected home designs.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Atomic coffee machine distributor roasted in appeal of trade mark decision
Intellectual Property 2019-01-15 8:30 pm By Christine Caulfield

The Australian distributor of Atomic coffee machines has lost a Federal Court appeal of an IP Australia decision allowing the registration of the Atomic trade mark by a South Perth cafe, with a judge slamming her evidence on the stand as untruthful.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Apple settles ‘HealthKit’ trade mark dispute with Aussie startup
Intellectual Property 2019-01-15 11:47 am By Miklos Bolza

Tech giant Apple can move forward with its plans to register the “HealthKit” trade mark for its popular health and fitness tracking app after resolving a dispute with an Australian startup over the mark.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

No fast end to McDonald’s hipster cafe trade mark dispute
Intellectual Property 2019-01-14 10:37 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

A David versus Goliath trade mark battle between an iconic Melbourne pub and McDonald’s over the global food giant’s new hipster cafe will continue, after the parties failed to reach an agreement to put the dispute to rest.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?

Paypal finds friend in IP Australia, wins trade mark challenge to FinPal
Intellectual Property 2019-01-11 10:43 pm By Cat Fredenburgh

Online payment giant PayPal has successfully opposed trade mark registration sought by Australian financial planning software company FinPal, with IP Australia finding the -pal suffix to be a “striking similarity” between the two marks.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?

Lost your password?