Please login to bookmarkClose

A judge overseeing a class action over AMP’s fees for no service practice has dismissed the applicant’s bid to access communications between AMP and law firm Clayton Utz that led up to an ostensibly independent report that allegedly went through 25 rounds of edits with the wealth manager’s inhouse lawyers.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Contact us to enquire about group subscriptions.
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au