In The News
High Court to rule on significance, and reach, of Victoria’s contingency fees
Law firms ask court to bless $42.5M cut of $170M Allianz class action settlement
Ex-Super Retail lawyer can’t appeal suppression order for public defence
J&J slams class action over cold and flu medications
‘Monumental waste of time’: Judge won’t hear summary dismissal bid in postgrads class action
Developer’s challenge to NSW Ports decision an abuse of process, court told
High Court asked to hear coverage row over Knox Grammar abuse claims
Port of Newcastle can’t move wharf dispute with Glencore out of state court
Noumi’s ex-boss might take stand in ASIC case over inventory disclosures
Phoslock class action doesn’t have to bear costs from competing case
Please login to bookmark Close

Mayfield Development is barred from bringing claims already traversed in a competition case by the ACCC that was thrown out by a court, NSW Ports has told an appeals court.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au