In The News
Dominique Grubisa asks High Court to clarify accessorial liability
KFC franchisee forced breastfeeding manager to express milk in storeroom tent
Gov’t throws Rex a lifeline with $50M debt acquisition
Former commercial silk joins Supreme Court bench
Mineralogy can’t get more discovery from CITIC in fight over $12B Pilbara mine
Energy Queensland unit fights probe into charging of Centrelink recipients
Class actions pile up against 3M
Bakers Delight challenges reverse onus finding in Fair Work case
Appeals court won’t revive defamation claims against AFP commander
Law Council backs targets to close workplace gender gap
Please login to bookmark Close

Wealth guru Dominque Grubisa wants the High Court to overturn a finding that she had actual knowledge that her company’s statements to customers were misleading, saying the case raises unresolved questions about accessorial liability.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au