In The News
Coles, Woolworths class action judge won’t ‘rubber stamp’ firms’ plan to join forces
‘Who can it be now?’ Men at Work trustee wants ruling on who gets royalties
‘Completely inadequate’: United Petroleum class action solicitors criticised for delays
Fortrend unlawfully withheld bonuses owed Shaw & Partners defectors: court
Judge OKs $500K coal worker class action settlement, grills firm’s fee claims
AusSuper cops $27M penalty for account merger failures
Telstra misled customers about Belong upload speeds, court finds
Cosmetic surgery class action faces battle over plan to drop doctor from case
Judge disqualifies himself from hearing Greensill cases
Will ACCC pick up pace of competition enforcement after sluggish two years?
Please login to bookmark Close

Wealth guru Dominque Grubisa wants the High Court to overturn a finding that she had actual knowledge her company’s statements were misleading, saying the case raises unresolved questions about accessorial liability.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au