In The News
Judge in failed CBA class actions used ‘far too onerous’ materiality test, appeals court told
Court OKs stolen wages settlement, holds off on ‘eye-watering’ fees
ASIC takes NAB to court over customer hardship claims
Seven settles lawsuit by ex-Spotlight reporter
Settlement reached with ‘highly unethical’ mastermind of Banksia class action
Full Court cites ‘wider relevance’ of copy and paste judgment
DWF snags 9 partners from Hall & Wilcox
Tasmanian judge found to have assaulted fiance spared jail time
Barristers acting on instructions from solicitor to be exempt from AML/CTF regime
ASX denies misleading investors about CHESS replacement project
Please login to bookmarkClose

An e-commerce company did not have a valid reason for dismissing an employee who worked from home on a mandatory in-office day and must pay him $26,496 in compensation, the Fair Work Commission has found.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au