In The News
Court approves $3.5M settlement in Melissa Caddick class action
Judge recuses herself from costs spat, citing associate’s relationship with lawyer
Court asked to shut down Sofronoff’s challenge to corruption report
‘Game, set, match’ for United class action’s fight against $2.3M security, court told
EVP wins $10.4M freezing orders against failed start-up StrongRoom AI
Plastic surgeon can’t escape class action despite applicant dropping claims
WA public housing landlord points to ‘limited resources’ in class action defence
Ex-EY partner told clients tax scheme ‘risky but not illegal’, court hears
AVID Property to swallow AVJennings in $365M buyout
Repped by KWM, Daibiru picks up Sydney office tower from Investa
Please login to bookmark Close

On the first day of trial in the Tax Office’s case against a former EY partner accused of marketing a tax loss access scheme and pocketing $700,000 in the process, the court heard former clients were assured the scheme was “risky but not illegal”. 

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au