In The News
Judge boots Queensland energy class action, says ‘profit maximisation’ not unlawful
Pauline Hanson can’t get discount on costs in Greens senator’s case
Nuix class action judge rejects bid to close shareholder class action up to trial
High Court asked to restore win for Bed Bath N’ Table in fight with Bed & Bath
Fintech start-up Chippit defeats PayPal’s opposition to ‘PayPool’ mark
Google maintains stronghold on search despite regulatory changes: ACCC report
Silk, federal judge appointed to Tasmania Supreme Court
Thomson Geer poaches IP, tech team from HopgoodGanim
NAB super trustee free to use $165M fees ‘as it saw fit’, class action judge says
Coles, Woolworths say price increases were genuine, and so were the discounts
Please login to bookmarkClose

Home retailer Bed Bath N’ Table has asked the High Court to reverse a Full Court judgment that found retailer House did not engage in misleading and deceptive conduct in setting up its Bed & Bath stores.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au