In The News
Judge’s ‘uncritical copying and pasting’ of submissions wins the day for law firm
Pauline Hanson’s tweet ‘a strong form of racism’, court finds
Virgin bondholders want to join Velocity Rewards to class action
‘Contingency on contingency’: Judge won’t halt IP dispute over Abilify generic
Oracle can’t shut down court battle with ATO over software royalty taxes
Isuzu takes fight over Directed Electronics’ case to Full Court
Bad reputation defence stays in Cambodia cyber slaves defamation case
Litigators of the week: Atanaskovic Hartnell, Marque win wars over words
‘Highly irresponsible’: Peninsula Health must pay $316,000 in junior doctors class action
Atanaskovic Hartnell wins appeal of ‘campaign of denigration’ ruling
Please login to bookmarkClose

The independence of a report by law firm Clayton Utz to ASIC over AMP’s practice of charging customers for services not performed was called into question Tuesday at the Hayne Royal Commission.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Contact us to enquire about group subscriptions.
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au