In The News
Armour takeover case against Baker McKenzie can’t boost damages to $135M
Banksia silk wants to cross-examine prosecutor’s witnesses in criminal case
India wins foreign state immunity appeal in fight over $111.3M arbitral award
$3M class action settlement over Nine’s Palm Island coverage wins approval
EDO rejects financial concerns after paying Santos legal costs
Contest between rival Google ad tech class actions on the cards
Large swath of Australia’s chief legal officers don’t report to the big boss
Pawn shop class action lead applicant MIA, court hears
HWL Ebsworth had legitimate interest in expelling older partner: appeals court
Law firms team up to file competing Google ad tech class action
Please login to bookmark Close

A judge has raised questions about a redacted funding agreement in a class action against two IAG units over allegedly worthless add-on insurance products, saying the details were needed for a swift resolution of the case.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au