In The News
CIMIC settles shareholder class action for $45.25M
Hytera can’t dodge finding it committed ‘industrial theft’ of Motorola’s source code
Boral prevails in challenge to CEO cross-examination in class actions
Barrister who accepted briefs for appearances on same day referred to watchdog
Judge approves $31.5M settlement in junior doctors class action
ASIC claims crypto firm Binance denied protections to derivatives investors
Aldi infringed copyright of Little Bellies fruit snacks, court finds
Melbourne law firm argues 700 clients can’t sue for negligence in class action
Hall & Wilcox brings on Moray & Agnew public law specialist
Slashing funder’s stolen wages cut could deter public interest cases, court told
Please login to bookmarkClose

A barrister and solicitor who accused the Victoria Supreme Court of bias have avoided a contempt of court ruling, despite a judge finding their conduct “fell short of the standards of competence and diligence” expected of lawyers.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au