The class actions, filed in Federal Court by Adero Law and the National Union of Workers, allege Aida Sales And Marketing and Credico Australia misclassified hundreds of workers to avoid paying minimum wage, overtime and other benefits.
The multi-million dollar actions, which are being financed by litigation funders Balance Legal Capital and Augusta Ventures, accuse Aida and Credico of breaching the Fair Work Act by classifying their army of employees as independent contractors.
The NUW said the actions were the “opening salvo” in a massive legal battle on behalf of thousands of misclassified Australian workers. The so-called anti-wage theft campaign is also investigating claims against two other marketing companies, global Interactive Group and PCA Group.
“The action is designed to ensure that vulnerable Australians who were badly underpaid, often less than $5 an hour when the legal minimum is more than $17, are paid what they are owed,” NUW assistant branch secretary Godfrey Moase said Monday.
“This money has been stolen from workers and we’ll be damned if we allow these companies to hold on to workers’ money.”
The workers sold products and services door-to-door and in shopping centres for major corporations including Telstra, Optus and Foxtel, the union said. They also raised funds for charities.
Some class members allege they often worked weeks without pay.
Aida and Credico did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.
The actions come two weeks after a Federal Court judge greenlighted a “sham” contract class action against Appco Australia Group, led by Chamberlains law firm.
In his ruling on May 18, Justice Michael Wigney criticisd the “clarity” of the case, but found the action had properly alleged that Appco established a standardised system and applied it to all proposed group members.
That alleged system, he said, was “so prescriptive and all-encompassing that they compel a conclusion that all individuals who were party to, or engaged pursuant to, that system were employees of Appco”.
That case is Bywater v Appco Group Australia Pty Ltd.
Latest posts by Christine Caulfield (see all)
- 17-yr-old trade mark error can’t be fixed, Full Court rules - July 16, 2018
- SNF’s decade-long battle over BASF mine patents comes to a close - July 17, 2018
- AMP class action lawyers agree to ceasefire in jurisdictional war - July 13, 2018