In The News
Judge rejects sacked Super Retail Group execs’ settlement claims
$56M settlement approved in Monash IVF class action
Kids clothing retailer hit with $5M penalty for worker exploitation
Third person sentenced over $180M Courtenay House Ponzi scheme
Lawyerly holiday publishing schedule
Johnson & Johnson hit with class action over cold and flu medications
ASIC, Noumi win appeal in privilege fight over PwC report
ā€˜In all circumstances unconscionableā€™: ASIC wins case against forex broker
Limitations defences not relevant to new claims in Victoria class actions, court told
Graincorp class action seeks to bring toxicity claims
Please login to bookmarkClose

A barrister for a group of people set to give evidence against Craig McLachlan at his upcoming defamation trial lost a bid Friday to suppress subpoenas by the actor on the grounds that the definition of ‘sexual harassment’ is too much in “flux”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au