In The News
Insurers on the hook for Opal Tower class action costs after failed appeal
Justin Hemmes’ Establishment wins trade mark spat with Brisbane restaurant
Seven faces Fair Work suit by former Spotlight journalist
No ‘bottomless pit’: Class action administrator put on notice about costs
Harvey Norman hit with second class action over ‘junk’ warranties
CIMIC loses appeal against insurers over coverage for Iraq bribery cases
Super Retail appeal to have ‘significant impact’ on settlements, court told
Failed CBA class actions want to stay fight over costs
Self Care wins IP action over FreezeFrame knockoffs
Appeal bid in crypto class action against Google, Meta falls flat
Please login to bookmarkClose

As pressure mounts for the board of MinterEllison to remove the law firm’s CEO in response to a staff email apologising for a partner’s representation of the federal attorney general, legal ethics experts told Lawyerly law firms must be free to vet potential clients, and that social issues may in the future play a bigger role in deciding whether to reject matters.

Subscribe for instant access to all Lawyerly content.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?

Contact us to enquire about group subscriptions.
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au