In The News
Armour takeover case against Baker McKenzie can’t boost damages to $135M
Banksia silk wants to cross-examine prosecutor’s witnesses in criminal case
Large swath of Australia’s chief legal officers don’t report to the big boss
Contest between rival Google ad tech class actions on the cards
India wins foreign state immunity appeal in fight over $111.3M arbitral award
$3M class action settlement over Nine’s Palm Island coverage wins approval
Pawn shop class action lead applicant MIA, court hears
EDO rejects financial concerns after paying Santos legal costs
HWL Ebsworth had legitimate interest in expelling older partner: appeals court
Law firms team up to file competing Google ad tech class action
Please login to bookmark Close

A former client of Moray & Agnew alleges the law firm waited six years after taking instructions before providing it with a costs agreement, claiming it racked up a $330,000 legal bill during this time.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au