In The News
Origin faces shareholder class action over energy markets guidance
Law firm might drop iPhone class action against Apple, court told
$20M settlement in NAB class action OK’d despite concerns over lawyers’ fees
No injunction against Mark Latham in case over homophobic tweet
Court rejects NAB super trustee’s bid for first-ever class action indemnity costs
Doctor’s defamation case over online reviews fails to clear serious harm bar
Mulpha threatens strike-out bid over claims in Mulgoa Rise class action
Baker McKenzie lures partner back to tax group
Quintis misled the market, but class action’s loss narrative lost the case
Perth magistrate loses legal challenge to move from Children’s Court
Please login to bookmark Close

Mulpha says a class action over the Mulgoa Rise development in Glenmore Park, NSW needs to clarify its negligence case to enable the developer to decide on the viability of potential cross-claims.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au