In The News
Lawyers for Banksia class action funder face possible court action
CIMIC settles shareholder class action for $45.25M
Boral wins challenge to CEO cross-examination in class actions
Hytera can’t dodge ‘substantial industrial theft’ finding in Motorola case
Barrister who accepted briefs for appearances on same day referred to watchdog
Judge approves $31.5M settlement in junior doctors class action
ASIC claims crypto firm Binance denied protections to derivatives investors
Melbourne law firm argues 700 clients can’t sue for negligence in class action
Aldi infringed copyright of Little Bellies fruit snacks, court finds
Hall & Wilcox brings on Moray & Agnew public law specialist
Please login to bookmarkClose

A judge has rejected an amended copyright case against US-based analytics company CoreLogic, expressing his displeasure at the use of imprecise phrases like ‘including’ and “such as’ in the revised pleading.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au