In The News
Google faces potential class action over AdTech dominance
High Court cases could push Blue Sky class action trial to 2026
Dominique Grubisa’s companies illegally scraped court websites: OAIC
Court approves landmark $75M detention centre class action settlement
Burger ad beef between McDonald’s, Hungry Jack’s done
Bubble tea chain Chatime fined for underpaying staff
Class action probe accuses union of forcing staff to join Labor Party
Travelex wins opposition to blockchain tech company’s trade marks
Collapsed Mosaic Brands owes creditors over $245M
Class action firm breaches costs disclosure rules again, fights penalty
Please login to bookmarkClose

A judge has slammed a $26 million penalty agreed to by Uber and the ACCC as “not within the range”, saying the impact of the rideshare giant’s misleading conduct appeared to be “trivial”.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au