In The News
Investor class action against Linchpin insurer AIG prevails
Judge approves $57.5M ANZ class action settlement, funder’s ATE costs
ACCC shuts lawyers for cartel immunity seekers out of the room
AGL cops a $25M penalty for overcharging welfare recipients
IC Markets CEO hit with guillotine orders for filing defence
Swoosh accused of providing credit to financially stressed customers
ACCC won’t give Catholic hospitals blessing to boycott private insurers
Lawyers for Banksia class action funder face possible court action
Boral wins challenge to CEO cross-examination in class actions
CIMIC settles shareholder class action for $45.25M
Please login to bookmarkClose

A judge has ruled that a settlement offer made in a case can be adduced into evidence in a construction company’s suit against its former lawyers, finding that the offer was not covered by without penalty privilege.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au