In The News
ASIC takes NAB to court over customer hardship claims
Seven settles lawsuit by ex-Spotlight reporter
Court OKs stolen wages settlement, holds off on ‘eye-watering’ fees
Settlement reached with ‘highly unethical’ mastermind of Banksia class action
Full Court cites ‘wider relevance’ of copy and paste judgment
DWF snags 9 partners from Hall & Wilcox
Tasmanian judge found to have assaulted fiance spared jail time
Barristers acting on instructions from solicitor to be exempt from AML/CTF regime
ASX denies misleading investors about CHESS replacement project
Judge worries compensation for axed Qantas ground crew ‘going off into never never’
Please login to bookmarkClose

Despite previously remarking that the penalty was “a bit light on”, a judge has ordered Squirrel Superannuation to pay $55,000 for false and misleading marketing linked to property investment for investors with self-managed superannuation funds.

Subscribe to Lawyerly to access this article.

Already a subscriber?
Lost your password?
error: The content is secured.

For information on rights and reprints, contact subscriptions@lawyerly.com.au